Bodø/Glimt v Inter
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Bodø/Glimt beat Inter 3–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Lautaro Martínez for 1+ shots total (87%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Lautaro Martínez for 1+ fouls committed (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lautaro Martínez | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Pio Esposito | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Marcus Thuram | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Henrikh Mkhitaryan | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lautaro Martínez | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marcus Thuram | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Pio Esposito | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jens Petter Hauge | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Henrikh Mkhitaryan | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Patrick Berg | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
| Alessandro Bastoni | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
| Nicolò Barella | fouls committed | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
| Pio Esposito | fouls drawn | 1+ | 70% | 4 | ✓ |
| Lautaro Martínez | shots on target | 1+ | 69% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn · Shots on target
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 78% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 74% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 45% | 2 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Inter 1–2 Bodø/Glimt Feb 2026
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Bodø/Glimt v Inter?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Bodø/Glimt v Inter?
The most confident call it got wrong was Lautaro Martínez at 78% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.