Where the books disagree
Back Over at one bookmaker and Under at another and you have covered both outcomes. Add up what the two prices imply: under 100% and the pair pays out whichever way the match goes. Over it, the excess is what covering both sides costs you. No model, no opinion — two prices and a subtraction.
Match result
Three outcomes, one match. Cover all three at the best price each and this is what it costs.
47 of 47 priced matches had the books disagreeing, typically costing 4.06% to cover every outcome.
Both teams to score
Two outcomes, and the books disagree on most of them.
37 of 47 priced matches had the books disagreeing, typically costing 3.98% to cover every outcome.
Match goals
712 two-sided positions priced, typically costing 3.84% to cover both outcomes. Captured 2026-08-17 14:48 to 2026-08-27 04:06, rebuilt once a day. These are not live prices.
Which account is worth holding
Across every selection we captured, this is how often each book had the best price, and what you gave up on a typical bet when it did not.
| BOOKMAKER | BEST OR TIED | TYPICAL SHORTFALL | SELECTIONS |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 68% | — | 170 |
| bet365 | 74% | — | 1008 |
| BetMGM | 17% | 2.47% | 78 |
| Paddy Power | 14% | 3.20% | 1008 |
"Best or tied" counts a selection where a book matched the top price, so the column does not add to 100. A book needs 30 quoted selections to appear.