Chelsea v Real Madrid
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Chelsea lost to Real Madrid 0–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Vinícius Júnior for 1+ fouls drawn (92%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Kai Havertz for 1+ fouls committed (76%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
13 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record →
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinícius Júnior | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 4 | ✓ |
| Eduardo Camavinga | fouls drawn | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Karim Benzema | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Vinícius Júnior | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 3 | ✓ |
| João Félix | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 3 | ✓ |
| Rodrygo | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Rodrygo | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kai Havertz | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Eduardo Camavinga | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kai Havertz | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 3 | ✓ |
| Luka Modrić | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Éder Militão | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Toni Kroos | fouls drawn | 1+ | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
| Vinícius Júnior | shots total | 1+ | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Shots total · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 61% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 58% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 28% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Real Madrid 2–0 Chelsea Apr 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Chelsea v Real Madrid?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Chelsea v Real Madrid?
The most confident call it got wrong was Kai Havertz at 76% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.