FC København v SSC Napoli
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before FC København drew with SSC Napoli 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Mohamed Elyounoussi for 1+ fouls committed (79%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Rasmus Højlund for 1+ fouls drawn (71%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamed Elyounoussi | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Scott McTominay | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Scott McTominay | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Miguel Gutiérrez | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jordan Larsson | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Noa Lang | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Juan Jesus | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Rasmus Højlund | fouls drawn | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Stanislav Lobotka | fouls drawn | 1+ | 71% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jordan Larsson | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
| Rasmus Højlund | shots total | 1+ | 70% | 2 | ✓ |
| Noa Lang | fouls drawn | 1+ | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
| Antonio Vergara | fouls drawn | 1+ | 69% | 2 | ✓ |
| Thomas Delaney | fouls drawn | 1+ | 68% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 61% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 59% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 34% | 5 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on FC København v SSC Napoli?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on FC København v SSC Napoli?
The most confident call it got wrong was Rasmus Højlund at 71% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.