Liverpool v Qarabağ FK
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Liverpool beat Qarabağ FK 6–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Wataru Endo for 1+ fouls committed (90%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Hugo Ekitiké for 1+ fouls committed (84%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wataru Endo | fouls committed | 1+ | 90% | 2 | ✓ |
| Hugo Ekitiké | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 0 | ✗ |
| Hugo Ekitiké | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 6 | ✓ |
| Cody Gakpo | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 6 | ✓ |
| Mohamed Salah | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 4 | ✓ |
| Cody Gakpo | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Rio Ngumoha | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Trey Nyoni | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Florian Wirtz | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 4 | ✓ |
| Alexis Mac Allister | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Rio Ngumoha | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dominik Szoboszlai | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Alexis Mac Allister | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 5 | ✓ |
| Ryan Gravenberch | fouls committed | 1+ | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 85% | 6 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 43% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 6% | 1 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Liverpool v Qarabağ FK?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Liverpool v Qarabağ FK?
The most confident call it got wrong was Hugo Ekitiké at 84% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.