Man City v FK Crvena Zvezda
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Man City beat FK Crvena Zvezda 3–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Erling Haaland for 1+ shots total (85%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Phil Foden for 1+ fouls drawn (68%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erling Haaland | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 6 | ✓ |
| Jérémy Doku | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 2 | ✓ |
| Julián Alvarez | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 8 | ✓ |
| Matheus Nunes | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 3 | ✓ |
| Rodri | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jérémy Doku | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Phil Foden | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 5 | ✓ |
| Phil Foden | fouls drawn | 1+ | 68% | 0 | ✗ |
| Rodri | shots total | 1+ | 68% | 5 | ✓ |
| Bernardo Silva | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
| Julián Alvarez | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
| Erling Haaland | shots on target | 1+ | 64% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sergio Gómez | shots total | 1+ | 62% | 1 | ✓ |
| Matheus Nunes | fouls committed | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls drawn · Fouls committed · Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FK Crvena Zvezda 2–3 Man City Dec 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Man City v FK Crvena Zvezda?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Man City v FK Crvena Zvezda?
The most confident call it got wrong was Phil Foden at 68% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.