PSV Eindhoven v Royale Union Saint-Gilloise
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before PSV Eindhoven lost to Royale Union Saint-Gilloise 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Ricardo Pepi for 1+ shots total (93%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Ivan Perišić for 1+ tackles (76%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Pepi | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sergiño Dest | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jerdy Schouten | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ivan Perišić | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Yarek Gasiorowski | tackles | 1+ | 74% | 4 | ✓ |
| Anass Salah-Eddine | tackles | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ivan Perišić | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 0 | ✗ |
| Anass Salah-Eddine | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sergiño Dest | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 4 | ✓ |
| Anass Salah-Eddine | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ivan Perišić | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ricardo Pepi | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ricardo Pepi | fouls drawn | 1+ | 63% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ricardo Pepi | shots on target | 1+ | 60% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls committed Fouls drawn Shots on target
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on PSV Eindhoven v Royale Union Saint-Gilloise?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on PSV Eindhoven v Royale Union Saint-Gilloise?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ivan Perišić at 76% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.