RC Lens v Sporting CP
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before RC Lens lost to Sporting CP 0–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Florian Thauvin for 1+ shots total (96%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Ruben Aguilar for 1+ tackles (85%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
2 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odsonne Édouard | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 1 | ✓ |
| Florian Thauvin | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 3 | ✓ |
| Franjo Ivanović | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 3 | ✓ |
| Nestory Irankunda | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 1 | ✓ |
| Luis Javier Suárez | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sergi Altimira | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Nestory Irankunda | fouls committed | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ruben Aguilar | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Luís Guilherme | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ismaelo Ganiou | tackles | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kyllian Antonio | tackles | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ruben Aguilar | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Issa Doumbia | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Luis Javier Suárez | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 69% | 0 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on RC Lens v Sporting CP?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on RC Lens v Sporting CP?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ruben Aguilar at 85% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.