ŠK Slovan Bratislava v GNK Dinamo Zagreb
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before ŠK Slovan Bratislava lost to GNK Dinamo Zagreb 1–4, the SharpXI model made 9 confident calls on the player markets and 7 landed — the strongest being Marko Pjaca for 1+ shots total (82%, had 1). Its clearest miss: David Strelec for 1+ fouls committed (73%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Pjaca | shots total | 1+ | 82% | 1 | ✓ |
| David Strelec | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 5 | ✓ |
| Raúl Torrente | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| David Strelec | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marko Pjaca | fouls committed | 1+ | 69% | 2 | ✓ |
| Marko Pjaca | shots on target | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
| David Strelec | fouls drawn | 1+ | 61% | 1 | ✓ |
| Marko Pjaca | fouls drawn | 1+ | 61% | 2 | ✓ |
| David Strelec | shots on target | 1+ | 59% | 1 | ✓ |
| Raúl Torrente | fouls drawn | 1+ | 36% | 0 | ✗ |
| Raúl Torrente | shots total | 1+ | 34% | 0 | ✗ |
| Raúl Torrente | shots on target | 1+ | 16% | 0 | ✗ |
| Raúl Torrente | cards | — | 12% | Not booked | ✗ |
| Marko Pjaca | cards | — | 11% | Not booked | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Shots on target · Fouls drawn · Cards
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 56% | 5 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 51% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 9% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on ŠK Slovan Bratislava v GNK Dinamo Zagreb?
7 of its 9 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on ŠK Slovan Bratislava v GNK Dinamo Zagreb?
The most confident call it got wrong was David Strelec at 73% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.