SK Sturm Graz v RB Leipzig
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before SK Sturm Graz beat RB Leipzig 1–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Loïs Openda for 1+ shots total (96%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Xavi Simons for 1+ shots total (93%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
5 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loïs Openda | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 2 | ✓ |
| Benjamin Šeško | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 0 | ✗ |
| Yussuf Poulsen | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 3 | ✓ |
| Xavi Simons | shots total | 1+ | 93% | 0 | ✗ |
| Christoph Baumgartner | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 5 | ✓ |
| Loïs Openda | fouls drawn | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christoph Baumgartner | fouls committed | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Yussuf Poulsen | fouls drawn | 1+ | 84% | 0 | ✗ |
| Nicolas Seiwald | tackles | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Xavi Simons | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Amadou Haidara | tackles | 1+ | 77% | 4 | ✓ |
| Antonio Nusa | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christoph Baumgartner | tackles | 1+ | 75% | 3 | ✓ |
| Antonio Nusa | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 4 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Fouls committed Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 53% | 1 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 50% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 11% | 3 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on SK Sturm Graz v RB Leipzig?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on SK Sturm Graz v RB Leipzig?
The most confident call it got wrong was Xavi Simons at 93% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.