Tottenham v Atlético Madrid
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Tottenham beat Atlético Madrid 3–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Randal Kolo Muani for 1+ fouls committed (83%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Johnny Cardoso for 1+ fouls committed (78%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randal Kolo Muani | fouls committed | 1+ | 83% | 3 | ✓ |
| Johnny Cardoso | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alexander Sørloth | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ademola Lookman | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Xavi Simons | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Antoine Griezmann | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mathys Tel | shots total | 1+ | 75% | 5 | ✓ |
| Giuliano Simeone | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Matteo Ruggeri | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mathys Tel | fouls drawn | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Julián Alvarez | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 7 | ✓ |
| Xavi Simons | shots total | 1+ | 70% | 4 | ✓ |
| Cristian Romero | fouls committed | 1+ | 67% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ademola Lookman | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 68% | 5 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 65% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 58% | 7 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Atlético Madrid 5–2 Tottenham Mar 2026
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Tottenham v Atlético Madrid?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Tottenham v Atlético Madrid?
The most confident call it got wrong was Johnny Cardoso at 78% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.