VfB Stuttgart v AC Sparta Praha
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before VfB Stuttgart drew with AC Sparta Praha 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Deniz Undav for 1+ shots total (83%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Ermedin Demirović for 1+ fouls committed (79%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
6 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record →
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deniz Undav | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 3 | ✓ |
| Atakan Karazor | fouls drawn | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Veljko Birmančević | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Ermedin Demirović | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 0 | ✗ |
| Enzo Millot | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 0 | ✗ |
| Atakan Karazor | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jamie Leweling | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Qazim Laci | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ermedin Demirović | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Veljko Birmančević | fouls committed | 1+ | 70% | 0 | ✗ |
| Pascal Stenzel | fouls committed | 1+ | 69% | 1 | ✓ |
| Enzo Millot | shots total | 1+ | 69% | 5 | ✓ |
| Anrie Chase | fouls committed | 1+ | 69% | 0 | ✗ |
| Qazim Laci | fouls committed | 1+ | 68% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls drawn · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 66% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 65% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 16% | 2 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on VfB Stuttgart v AC Sparta Praha?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on VfB Stuttgart v AC Sparta Praha?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ermedin Demirović at 79% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.