AZ Alkmaar v FC Vaduz
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Conference League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before AZ Alkmaar beat FC Vaduz 4–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Jens Odgaard for 1+ shots total (85%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Myron Van Brederode for 1+ fouls committed (72%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
5 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jens Odgaard | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 6 | ✓ |
| Yusuf Barası | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 4 | ✓ |
| Mayckel Lahdo | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yusuf Barası | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Myron Van Brederode | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jens Odgaard | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 3 | ✓ |
| Peer Koopmeiners | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mayckel Lahdo | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Tijjani Reijnders | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 3 | ✓ |
| Peer Koopmeiners | fouls drawn | 1+ | 65% | 0 | ✗ |
| Myron Van Brederode | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 2 | ✓ |
| Tijjani Reijnders | fouls committed | 1+ | 63% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yukinari Sugawara | fouls committed | 1+ | 63% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mees De Wit | fouls committed | 1+ | 63% | 3 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls committed Fouls drawn
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FC Vaduz 1–2 AZ Alkmaar Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on AZ Alkmaar v FC Vaduz?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on AZ Alkmaar v FC Vaduz?
The most confident call it got wrong was Myron Van Brederode at 72% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Conference League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.