Cercle Brugge v FC St. Gallen 1879
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Conference League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Cercle Brugge beat FC St. Gallen 1879 6–2, the SharpXI model made 10 confident calls on the player markets and 6 landed — the strongest being Felix Mambimbi for 1+ fouls drawn (90%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Kazeem Olaigbe for 1+ shots total (85%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
2 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Mambimbi | fouls drawn | 1+ | 90% | 1 | ✓ |
| Felix Mambimbi | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kazeem Olaigbe | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Felix Mambimbi | tackles | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kazeem Olaigbe | tackles | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kazeem Olaigbe | fouls drawn | 1+ | 65% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kazeem Olaigbe | fouls committed | 1+ | 63% | 0 | ✗ |
| Felix Mambimbi | fouls committed | 1+ | 63% | 1 | ✓ |
| Felix Mambimbi | shots on target | 1+ | 57% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kazeem Olaigbe | shots on target | 1+ | 57% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn Shots total Tackles Fouls committed Shots on target
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Cercle Brugge v FC St. Gallen 1879?
6 of its 10 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Cercle Brugge v FC St. Gallen 1879?
The most confident call it got wrong was Kazeem Olaigbe at 85% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Conference League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.