Chelsea v Djurgårdens IF
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Conference League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Chelsea beat Djurgårdens IF 1–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall for 1+ fouls drawn (90%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Shumaira Mheuka for 1+ shots total (90%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
4 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall | fouls drawn | 1+ | 90% | 2 | ✓ |
| Tyrique George | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 4 | ✓ |
| Shumaira Mheuka | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marc Cucurella | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Malo Gusto | tackles | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Benoît Badiashile | tackles | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 6 | ✓ |
| Jadon Sancho | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Josh Acheampong | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Shumaira Mheuka | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Reece James | tackles | 1+ | 74% | 5 | ✓ |
| Trevoh Chalobah | tackles | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tyrique George | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn Shots total Tackles
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Djurgårdens IF 1–4 Chelsea May 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Chelsea v Djurgårdens IF?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Chelsea v Djurgårdens IF?
The most confident call it got wrong was Shumaira Mheuka at 90% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Conference League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.