Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell usUpdated daily. Tell us
SharpXI©
UEFA Conference League 23/24

Fenerbahçe v FC Nordsjælland

How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Conference League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.

Fenerbahçe3 – 1 FC Nordsjælland 21 Sep 2023
5/8
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Fenerbahçe beat FC Nordsjælland 3–1, the SharpXI model made 8 confident calls on the player markets and 5 landed — the strongest being Fred for 1+ tackles (89%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Alexander Djiku for 1+ fouls committed (72%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Gergo Bogar refereed this match

4 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record

See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip ›

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Fred tackles 1+ 89% 2 ✓
Fred fouls committed 1+ 83% 1 ✓
Fred shots total 1+ 79% 3 ✓
Fred fouls drawn 1+ 77% 1 ✓
Alexander Djiku tackles 1+ 76% 2 ✓
Alexander Djiku fouls committed 1+ 72% 0 ✗
Alexander Djiku fouls drawn 1+ 60% 0 ✗
Alexander Djiku shots total 1+ 51% 0 ✗
Fred shots on target 1+ 31% 1 ✓
Alexander Djiku shots on target 1+ 23% 0 ✗

How these are modelled: Tackles Fouls committed Shots total Fouls drawn Shots on target

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Fenerbahçe v FC Nordsjælland?

5 of its 8 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Fenerbahçe v FC Nordsjælland?

The most confident call it got wrong was Alexander Djiku at 72% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Conference League?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.