Real Betis v KAA Gent
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Conference League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Real Betis lost to KAA Gent 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Chimy Ávila for 1+ fouls drawn (91%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Isco for 1+ fouls drawn (91%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
5 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isco | fouls drawn | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Chimy Ávila | fouls drawn | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Antony | fouls drawn | 1+ | 90% | 3 | ✓ |
| Vitor Roque | fouls drawn | 1+ | 90% | 3 | ✓ |
| Chimy Ávila | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 4 | ✓ |
| Antony | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sergi Altimira | tackles | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Vitor Roque | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 5 | ✓ |
| Isco | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Abdessamad Ezzalzouli | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 4 | ✓ |
| Youssouf Sabaly | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Antony | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Aitor Ruibal | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Johnny Cardoso | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn Shots total Tackles
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- KAA Gent 0–3 Real Betis Feb 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Real Betis v KAA Gent?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Real Betis v KAA Gent?
The most confident call it got wrong was Isco at 91% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Conference League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.