Cambridge United v Queens Park Rangers
How the SharpXI model rated this EFL Cup fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Cambridge United lost to Queens Park Rangers 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Michael Frey for 1+ shots total (97%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Lyndon Dykes for 1+ shots total (89%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
3 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfie Lloyd | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 1 | ✓ |
| Michael Frey | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 3 | ✓ |
| Paul Smyth | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lyndon Dykes | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alfie Lloyd | shots on target | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Paul Smyth | shots on target | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lyndon Dykes | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 0 | ✗ |
| Lucas Andersen | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jimmy Dunne | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Shayne Lavery | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jonathan Varane | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Elijah Dixon-Bonner | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 5 | ✓ |
| Michael Frey | fouls committed | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Paul Smyth | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 3 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target Fouls committed Fouls drawn
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Cambridge United v Queens Park Rangers?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Cambridge United v Queens Park Rangers?
The most confident call it got wrong was Lyndon Dykes at 89% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the EFL Cup?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.