Rotherham United v Crewe Alexandra
How the SharpXI model rated this EFL Cup fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Rotherham United beat Crewe Alexandra 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 7 landed — the strongest being Sam Nombe for 1+ shots total (83%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Christ Junior Tiehi for 1+ tackles (76%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
5 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Nombe | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 4 | ✓ |
| Hakeem Odofin | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Christ Junior Tiehi | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jamie McCart | tackles | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jamie Knight-Lebel | tackles | 1+ | 72% | 3 | ✓ |
| Hakeem Odofin | fouls committed | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sam Nombe | fouls drawn | 1+ | 67% | 3 | ✓ |
| Reece James | tackles | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
| Christ Junior Tiehi | fouls committed | 1+ | 66% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christ Junior Tiehi | fouls drawn | 1+ | 66% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sam Nombe | fouls committed | 1+ | 64% | 1 | ✓ |
| Hakeem Odofin | shots total | 1+ | 63% | 3 | ✓ |
| Hakeem Odofin | fouls drawn | 1+ | 59% | 0 | ✗ |
| Reece James | fouls drawn | 1+ | 57% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls committed Fouls drawn
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Rotherham United v Crewe Alexandra?
7 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Rotherham United v Crewe Alexandra?
The most confident call it got wrong was Christ Junior Tiehi at 76% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the EFL Cup?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.