SC Cambuur v Fortuna Sittard
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before SC Cambuur lost to Fortuna Sittard 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Burak Yılmaz for 1+ shots total (94%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Thomas Buitink for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burak Yılmaz | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 5 | ✓ |
| Thomas Buitink | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Úmaro Embaló | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Roberts Uldriķis | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Tijjani Noslin | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Remco Balk | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Íñigo Cordoba | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 5 | ✓ |
| Silvester van der Water | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Michael Breij | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kristijan Bistrović | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mees Hoedemakers | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mitchell Paulissen | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Burak Yılmaz | shots on target | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Daniel Van Kaam | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Fortuna Sittard 3–1 SC Cambuur Aug 2026
- Fortuna Sittard 1–4 SC Cambuur Aug 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on SC Cambuur v Fortuna Sittard?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on SC Cambuur v Fortuna Sittard?
The most confident call it got wrong was Thomas Buitink at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.