Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell usUpdated daily. Tell us
SharpXI©
UEFA Europa League 24/25

Bodø/Glimt v FC Porto

How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.

Bodø/Glimt3 – 2 FC Porto 25 Sep 2024
12/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Bodø/Glimt beat FC Porto 3–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Samu Aghehowa for 1+ shots total (97%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Patrick Berg for 1+ fouls drawn (69%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Orel Grinfeeld refereed this match

8 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record

See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip ›

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Samu Aghehowa shots total 1+ 97% 4 ✓
Patrick Berg tackles 1+ 85% 3 ✓
Nico González tackles 1+ 85% 1 ✓
Jens Petter Hauge shots total 1+ 85% 4 ✓
Nehuén Pérez tackles 1+ 78% 2 ✓
Patrick Berg shots total 1+ 76% 2 ✓
Jens Petter Hauge fouls drawn 1+ 73% 2 ✓
Samu Aghehowa shots on target 1+ 73% 2 ✓
Nico González fouls committed 1+ 71% 2 ✓
Patrick Berg fouls drawn 1+ 69% 0 ✗
Patrick Berg fouls committed 1+ 67% 2 ✓
Nico González shots total 1+ 67% 5 ✓
Jens Petter Hauge fouls committed 1+ 64% 0 ✗
Samu Aghehowa fouls committed 1+ 64% 1 ✓

How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Shots on target Fouls committed

Dig deeper

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Bodø/Glimt v FC Porto?

12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Bodø/Glimt v FC Porto?

The most confident call it got wrong was Patrick Berg at 69% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.