Dynamo Kyiv v Stade Rennais
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Dynamo Kyiv lost to Stade Rennais 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Arnaud Kalimuendo for 1+ shots total (94%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Martin Terrier for 1+ shots total (97%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
6 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Terrier | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 0 | ✗ |
| Arnaud Kalimuendo | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Désiré Doué | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Lesley Ugochukwu | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lovro Majer | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 4 | ✓ |
| Arnaud Kalimuendo | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kamaldeen Sulemana | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Désiré Doué | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Benjamin Bourigeaud | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kamaldeen Sulemana | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Arnaud Kalimuendo | shots on target | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Martin Terrier | shots on target | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Benjamin Bourigeaud | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Martin Terrier | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls committed Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Stade Rennais 2–1 Dynamo Kyiv Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Dynamo Kyiv v Stade Rennais?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Dynamo Kyiv v Stade Rennais?
The most confident call it got wrong was Martin Terrier at 97% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.