FC Porto v VfB Stuttgart
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before FC Porto beat VfB Stuttgart 2–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Deniz Undav for 1+ shots total (97%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Tiago Tomás for 1+ fouls drawn (92%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
10 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deniz Undav | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 3 | ✓ |
| Terem Moffi | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ermedin Demirović | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Maximilian Mittelstädt | tackles | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Tiago Tomás | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 0 | ✗ |
| Borja Sainz | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 4 | ✓ |
| Tiago Tomás | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Alberto Costa | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Atakan Karazor | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bilal El Khannouss | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Borja Sainz | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Deniz Undav | shots on target | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ermedin Demirović | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 2 | ✓ |
| Atakan Karazor | fouls drawn | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Shots on target Fouls committed
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- VfB Stuttgart 1–2 FC Porto Mar 2026
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on FC Porto v VfB Stuttgart?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on FC Porto v VfB Stuttgart?
The most confident call it got wrong was Tiago Tomás at 92% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.