Ferencváros TC v Trabzonspor
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Ferencváros TC beat Trabzonspor 3–2, the SharpXI model made 9 confident calls on the player markets and 5 landed — the strongest being Maximiliano Gómez for 1+ shots total (94%, had 5). Its clearest miss: Yusuf Yazıcı for 1+ tackles (76%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
2 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximiliano Gómez | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 5 | ✓ |
| Yusuf Yazıcı | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Yusuf Yazıcı | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Maximiliano Gómez | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Maximiliano Gómez | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yusuf Yazıcı | fouls committed | 1+ | 67% | 0 | ✗ |
| Yusuf Yazıcı | fouls drawn | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
| Maximiliano Gómez | shots on target | 1+ | 60% | 3 | ✓ |
| Maximiliano Gómez | tackles | 1+ | 59% | 0 | ✗ |
| Yusuf Yazıcı | shots on target | 1+ | 46% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yusuf Yazıcı | cards | — | 18% | Not booked | ✗ |
| Maximiliano Gómez | cards | — | 18% | Not booked | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Fouls committed Shots on target Cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Trabzonspor 1–0 Ferencváros TC Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Ferencváros TC v Trabzonspor?
5 of its 9 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Ferencváros TC v Trabzonspor?
The most confident call it got wrong was Yusuf Yazıcı at 76% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.