GNK Dinamo Zagreb v KRC Genk
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before GNK Dinamo Zagreb lost to KRC Genk 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Dion Drena Beljo for 1+ shots total (94%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Matteo Pérez Vinlöf for 1+ tackles (85%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
10 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dion Drena Beljo | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Matteo Pérez Vinlöf | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sergi Domínguez | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Miha Zajc | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dion Drena Beljo | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Junya Ito | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Miha Zajc | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Dion Drena Beljo | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Miha Zajc | fouls committed | 1+ | 67% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sergi Domínguez | fouls committed | 1+ | 64% | 1 | ✓ |
| Matteo Pérez Vinlöf | fouls committed | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
| Miha Zajc | fouls drawn | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
| Dion Drena Beljo | fouls drawn | 1+ | 61% | 0 | ✗ |
| Junya Ito | fouls drawn | 1+ | 61% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls committed Shots on target Fouls drawn
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- KRC Genk 3–3 GNK Dinamo Zagreb Feb 2026
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on GNK Dinamo Zagreb v KRC Genk?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on GNK Dinamo Zagreb v KRC Genk?
The most confident call it got wrong was Matteo Pérez Vinlöf at 85% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.