Ludogorets v FC Midtjylland
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Ludogorets lost to FC Midtjylland 0–2, the SharpXI model made 10 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Adam Buksa for 1+ shots total (94%, had 2). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
12 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Buksa | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kevin Mbabu | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 3 | ✓ |
| Adam Buksa | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kevin Mbabu | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 4 | ✓ |
| Mads Bech Sørensen | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 2 | ✓ |
| Adam Buksa | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
| Adam Buksa | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mads Bech Sørensen | fouls committed | 1+ | 64% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kevin Mbabu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 61% | 2 | ✓ |
| Adam Buksa | tackles | 1+ | 59% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mads Bech Sørensen | fouls drawn | 1+ | 50% | 1 | ✓ |
| Mads Bech Sørensen | shots total | 1+ | 49% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kevin Mbabu | shots total | 1+ | 30% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kevin Mbabu | cards | — | 19% | Booked | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls committed Tackles Fouls drawn Shots on target Cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Ludogorets v FC Midtjylland?
10 of its 10 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Ludogorets v FC Midtjylland?
Every one of its confident calls landed this time — a single strong game, not a verdict. When the model does miss, those rows sit in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross; we never hide them.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.