Malmö FF v 1. FC Union Berlin
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Malmö FF lost to 1. FC Union Berlin 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Sheraldo Becker for 1+ shots total (94%, had 4). Its clearest miss: Julian Ryerson for 1+ shots total (83%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
10 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sheraldo Becker | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Jordan Siebatcheu | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Jordan Siebatcheu | shots on target | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sheraldo Becker | shots on target | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Julian Ryerson | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| András Schäfer | fouls drawn | 1+ | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
| Janik Haberer | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 5 | ✓ |
| Christopher Trimmel | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Rani Khedira | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| András Schäfer | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Janik Haberer | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 4 | ✓ |
| Julian Ryerson | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sheraldo Becker | fouls drawn | 1+ | 68% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jordan Siebatcheu | fouls committed | 1+ | 67% | 3 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target Fouls drawn Fouls committed
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- 1. FC Union Berlin 1–0 Malmö FF Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Malmö FF v 1. FC Union Berlin?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Malmö FF v 1. FC Union Berlin?
The most confident call it got wrong was Julian Ryerson at 83% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.