Qarabağ FK v Malmö FF
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Qarabağ FK lost to Malmö FF 1–2, the SharpXI model made 7 confident calls on the player markets and 6 landed — the strongest being Erik Botheim for 1+ fouls drawn (78%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Pontus Jansson for 1+ shots total (51%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
8 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erik Botheim | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Erik Botheim | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Pontus Jansson | tackles | 1+ | 68% | 1 | ✓ |
| Erik Botheim | fouls committed | 1+ | 64% | 2 | ✓ |
| Erik Botheim | tackles | 1+ | 59% | 1 | ✓ |
| Pontus Jansson | fouls committed | 1+ | 55% | 2 | ✓ |
| Pontus Jansson | shots total | 1+ | 51% | 0 | ✗ |
| Erik Botheim | shots on target | 1+ | 46% | 3 | ✓ |
| Pontus Jansson | fouls drawn | 1+ | 36% | 1 | ✓ |
| Pontus Jansson | shots on target | 1+ | 23% | 0 | ✗ |
| Erik Botheim | cards | — | 18% | Not booked | ✗ |
| Pontus Jansson | cards | — | 13% | Not booked | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn Shots total Tackles Fouls committed Shots on target Cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Qarabağ FK v Malmö FF?
6 of its 7 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Qarabağ FK v Malmö FF?
The most confident call it got wrong was Pontus Jansson at 51% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.