Real Betis v Panathinaikos FC
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Real Betis beat Panathinaikos FC 4–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Antony for 1+ shots total (94%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Marc Roca for 1+ fouls committed (86%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
10 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antony | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 6 | ✓ |
| Abdessamad Ezzalzouli | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Cucho Hernández | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Abdessamad Ezzalzouli | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Sofyan Amrabat | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marc Roca | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Aitor Ruibal | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Renato Sanches | fouls committed | 1+ | 86% | 1 | ✓ |
| Davide Calabria | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 4 | ✓ |
| Pedro Chirivella | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Álvaro Fidalgo | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Facundo Pellistri | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Aitor Ruibal | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Abdessamad Ezzalzouli | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Fouls committed Tackles
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Panathinaikos FC 1–0 Real Betis Mar 2026
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Real Betis v Panathinaikos FC?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Real Betis v Panathinaikos FC?
The most confident call it got wrong was Marc Roca at 86% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.