SK Sturm Graz v SK Brann
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before SK Sturm Graz beat SK Brann 1–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Noah Jean Holm for 1+ fouls drawn (92%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Tim Oermann for 1+ tackles (85%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
8 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noah Jean Holm | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 3 | ✓ |
| Tim Oermann | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Jacob Lungi Sørensen | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Emanuel Aiwu | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Emir Karić | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Noah Jean Holm | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 4 | ✓ |
| Noah Jean Holm | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jacob Lungi Sørensen | fouls drawn | 1+ | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jacob Lungi Sørensen | fouls committed | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
| Emir Karić | fouls committed | 1+ | 63% | 1 | ✓ |
| Noah Jean Holm | shots on target | 1+ | 60% | 2 | ✓ |
| Noah Jean Holm | tackles | 1+ | 59% | 3 | ✓ |
| Emanuel Aiwu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 53% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tim Oermann | fouls committed | 1+ | 52% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn Tackles Shots total Fouls committed Shots on target
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on SK Sturm Graz v SK Brann?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on SK Sturm Graz v SK Brann?
The most confident call it got wrong was Tim Oermann at 85% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.