Latvia v North Macedonia
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Nations League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Latvia lost to North Macedonia 0–3, the SharpXI model made 9 confident calls on the player markets and 7 landed — the strongest being Eljif Elmas for 1+ shots total (87%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Eljif Elmas for 1+ fouls committed (62%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
1 match on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eljif Elmas | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Bojan Miovski | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Eljif Elmas | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| Bojan Miovski | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Eljif Elmas | tackles | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
| Bojan Miovski | fouls committed | 1+ | 62% | 1 | ✓ |
| Eljif Elmas | fouls committed | 1+ | 62% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bojan Miovski | tackles | 1+ | 52% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bojan Miovski | shots on target | 1+ | 52% | 1 | ✓ |
| Eljif Elmas | shots on target | 1+ | 48% | 3 | ✓ |
| Stole Dimitrievski | fouls drawn | 1+ | 6% | 0 | ✗ |
| Stole Dimitrievski | tackles | 1+ | 1% | 0 | ✗ |
| Stole Dimitrievski | shots on target | 1+ | 1% | 0 | ✗ |
| Stole Dimitrievski | shots total | 1+ | 1% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Fouls drawn Tackles Fouls committed Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- North Macedonia 1–0 Latvia Nov 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Latvia v North Macedonia?
7 of its 9 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Latvia v North Macedonia?
The most confident call it got wrong was Eljif Elmas at 62% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Nations League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.