SV Werder Bremen v Darmstadt 98
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before SV Werder Bremen drew with Darmstadt 98 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Justin Njinmah for 1+ shots total (81%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Jens Stage for 1+ fouls committed (82%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jens Stage | fouls committed | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Justin Njinmah | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 1 | ✓ |
| Marvin Ducksch | shots total | 1+ | 81% | 4 | ✓ |
| Sebastian Polter | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tim Skarke | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Nick Woltemade | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Christian Groß | fouls committed | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Felix Agu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sebastian Polter | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 4 | ✓ |
| Justin Njinmah | fouls drawn | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Marvin Mehlem | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jens Stage | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Romano Schmid | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 3 | ✓ |
| Senne Lynen | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 63% | 7 cards | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 56% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 53% | Yes | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards · Match goals
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Darmstadt 98 4–2 SV Werder Bremen Oct 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on SV Werder Bremen v Darmstadt 98?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on SV Werder Bremen v Darmstadt 98?
The most confident call it got wrong was Jens Stage at 82% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.