Atalanta v Club Brugge KV
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Atalanta beat Club Brugge KV 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Nikola Krstović for 1+ shots total (84%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Christos Tzolis for 1+ fouls committed (68%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nikola Krstović | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ademola Lookman | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 2 | ✓ |
| Yunus Musah | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Christos Tzolis | shots total | 1+ | 70% | 3 | ✓ |
| Christos Tzolis | fouls committed | 1+ | 68% | 0 | ✗ |
| Lazar Samardžić | shots total | 1+ | 68% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kamaldeen Sulemana | shots total | 1+ | 68% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christos Tzolis | fouls drawn | 1+ | 66% | 1 | ✓ |
| Nikola Krstović | fouls drawn | 1+ | 65% | 1 | ✓ |
| Carlos Forbs | shots total | 1+ | 65% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mario Pašalić | shots total | 1+ | 65% | 3 | ✓ |
| Nikola Krstović | fouls committed | 1+ | 62% | 1 | ✓ |
| Éderson | shots total | 1+ | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
| Davide Zappacosta | shots total | 1+ | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 68% | 3 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 59% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 16% | 2 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Atalanta 1–3 Club Brugge KV Feb 2025
- Club Brugge KV 2–1 Atalanta Feb 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Atalanta v Club Brugge KV?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Atalanta v Club Brugge KV?
The most confident call it got wrong was Christos Tzolis at 68% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.