Updated daily through the season. Spot something off? Tell us →Updated daily. Tell us →
SharpXI© Open the screener
UEFA Champions League · 24/25

Atlético Madrid v Real Madrid

How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.

Atlético Madrid1 – 0 Real Madrid 12 Mar 2025
8/14
of the model's most-confident calls landed. Every one was published before kick-off and priced the same way as every other fixture. A single game is noise, not a verdict — the season-long record is on the track record.

Before Atlético Madrid beat Real Madrid 1–0, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Jude Bellingham for 1+ fouls drawn (81%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Eduardo Camavinga for 1+ fouls drawn (83%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.

Match officials
Szymon Marciniak refereed this match 4.29cards a game· league 3.96 24games
Szymon Marciniak's card record →
See the full player stats boardBoth likely XIs side by side — hit rates over your chosen window, add to your slip

Player markets — the model's calls

Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.

PlayerMarketLineModel ActualResult
Eduardo Camavinga fouls drawn 1+ 83% 0
Kylian Mbappé shots total 1+ 83% 0
Jude Bellingham fouls drawn 1+ 81% 3
Alexander Sørloth shots total 1+ 81% 2
Vinícius Júnior fouls drawn 1+ 80% 2
Vinícius Júnior shots total 1+ 80% 2
Ángel Correa shots total 1+ 79% 1
Conor Gallagher fouls drawn 1+ 78% 1
Alexander Sørloth fouls committed 1+ 78% 0
Reinildo Mandava fouls committed 1+ 77% 0
Eduardo Camavinga fouls committed 1+ 76% 2
Ángel Correa fouls committed 1+ 76% 0
Julián Alvarez shots total 1+ 76% 5
Conor Gallagher fouls committed 1+ 75% 0

How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Shots total · Fouls committed

Team & match markets

MarketLineModel ActualResult
BTTS Yes 60% No
Match goals O2.5 56% 1 goals
Match cards O4.5 28% 8 cards

How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards

Dig deeper

Past meetings

Frequently asked

How did the SharpXI model do on Atlético Madrid v Real Madrid?

8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.

What did the model get wrong on Atlético Madrid v Real Madrid?

The most confident call it got wrong was Eduardo Camavinga at 83% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.

Are these probabilities hindsight?

No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.

Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?

No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.

SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.