Bodø/Glimt v Juventus
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Bodø/Glimt lost to Juventus 2–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Loïs Openda for 1+ fouls drawn (84%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Khéphren Thuram for 1+ fouls committed (81%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loïs Openda | fouls drawn | 1+ | 84% | 1 | ✓ |
| Fabio Miretti | fouls drawn | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Loïs Openda | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 2 | ✓ |
| Khéphren Thuram | fouls committed | 1+ | 81% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kenan Yıldız | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Francisco Conceição | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 4 | ✓ |
| Teun Koopmeiners | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Manuel Locatelli | fouls committed | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Francisco Conceição | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 1 | ✓ |
| Weston McKennie | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Francisco Conceição | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Fabio Miretti | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 3 | ✓ |
| Lloyd Kelly | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 4 | ✓ |
| Vasilije Adžić | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls drawn · Shots total · Fouls committed
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 80% | 5 goals | ✓ |
| BTTS | Yes | 78% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 21% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals · Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Bodø/Glimt v Juventus?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Bodø/Glimt v Juventus?
The most confident call it got wrong was Khéphren Thuram at 81% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.