Inter v Liverpool
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Champions League fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Inter lost to Liverpool 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 13 landed — the strongest being Hugo Ekitiké for 1+ fouls committed (84%, had 2). Its clearest miss: Alexis Mac Allister for 1+ fouls committed (73%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hugo Ekitiké | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 2 | ✓ |
| Hugo Ekitiké | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 3 | ✓ |
| Lautaro Martínez | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 3 | ✓ |
| Alexander Isak | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Conor Bradley | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Dominik Szoboszlai | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Marcus Thuram | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lautaro Martínez | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Marcus Thuram | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Alexis Mac Allister | fouls committed | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alessandro Bastoni | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lautaro Martínez | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Ibrahima Konaté | fouls committed | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Florian Wirtz | shots total | 1+ | 71% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 57% | No | ✗ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 53% | 1 goals | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 35% | 5 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Inter v Liverpool?
13 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Inter v Liverpool?
The most confident call it got wrong was Alexis Mac Allister at 73% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Champions League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.