Fulham v Liverpool
How the SharpXI model rated this EFL Cup fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Fulham drew with Liverpool 1–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Darwin Núñez for 1+ shots total (97%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Diogo Jota for 1+ shots total (89%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
7 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darwin Núñez | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 3 | ✓ |
| João Palhinha | tackles | 1+ | 94% | 7 | ✓ |
| Alexis Mac Allister | tackles | 1+ | 90% | 5 | ✓ |
| Cody Gakpo | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 1 | ✓ |
| Harvey Elliott | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Diogo Jota | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Luis Díaz | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 3 | ✓ |
| Harvey Elliott | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Antonee Robinson | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 3 | ✓ |
| Curtis Jones | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Darwin Núñez | shots on target | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| Joe Gomez | tackles | 1+ | 84% | 1 | ✓ |
| Curtis Jones | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Raúl Jiménez | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Liverpool 0–0 Fulham Sep 2026
- Liverpool 2–0 Fulham Apr 2026
- Fulham 2–2 Liverpool Jan 2026
- Fulham 3–2 Liverpool Apr 2025
- Liverpool 2–2 Fulham Dec 2024
- Fulham 1–3 Liverpool Apr 2024
- Liverpool 2–1 Fulham Jan 2024
- Liverpool 4–3 Fulham Dec 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Fulham v Liverpool?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Fulham v Liverpool?
The most confident call it got wrong was Diogo Jota at 89% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the EFL Cup?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.