Reading v Stevenage
How the SharpXI model rated this EFL Cup fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Reading lost to Stevenage 1–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan for 1+ shots total (84%, had 3). Its clearest miss: John Clarke for 1+ tackles (73%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
6 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 3 | ✓ |
| Tyrese Fornah | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kelvin Abrefa | tackles | 1+ | 76% | 4 | ✓ |
| Tyrese Fornah | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 1 | ✓ |
| John Clarke | tackles | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Thomas Holmes | tackles | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Nesta Guinness-Walker | tackles | 1+ | 72% | 4 | ✓ |
| Tom McIntyre | tackles | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan | tackles | 1+ | 66% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan | fouls drawn | 1+ | 66% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kelvin Ehibhatiomhan | fouls committed | 1+ | 65% | 5 | ✓ |
| Tyrese Fornah | fouls committed | 1+ | 62% | 3 | ✓ |
| Nesta Guinness-Walker | shots total | 1+ | 60% | 0 | ✗ |
| Tyrese Fornah | fouls drawn | 1+ | 59% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Fouls committed
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Stevenage 0–3 Reading Aug 2026
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Reading v Stevenage?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Reading v Stevenage?
The most confident call it got wrong was John Clarke at 73% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the EFL Cup?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.