West Ham v Fulham
How the SharpXI model rated this EFL Cup fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before West Ham lost to Fulham 2–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Rodrigo Muniz for 1+ shots total (97%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Joshua King for 1+ shots total (89%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
7 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rodrigo Muniz | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 3 | ✓ |
| Valentín Castellanos | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 1 | ✓ |
| Gonzalo García | shots total | 1+ | 92% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jarrod Bowen | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kevin | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Joshua King | shots total | 1+ | 89% | 0 | ✗ |
| Antonee Robinson | tackles | 1+ | 88% | 3 | ✓ |
| Rodrigo Muniz | shots on target | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
| César Palacios | shots total | 1+ | 84% | 4 | ✓ |
| Joshua Ajala | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Shea Charles | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Manuel Ángel Morán | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
| Emile Smith Rowe | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 1 | ✓ |
| Harrison Reed | shots total | 1+ | 83% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Fulham 0–1 West Ham Mar 2026
- West Ham 0–1 Fulham Dec 2025
- West Ham 3–2 Fulham Jan 2025
- Fulham 1–1 West Ham Sep 2024
- West Ham 0–2 Fulham Apr 2024
- Fulham 5–0 West Ham Dec 2023
- Fulham 0–1 West Ham Apr 2023
- West Ham 3–1 Fulham Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on West Ham v Fulham?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on West Ham v Fulham?
The most confident call it got wrong was Joshua King at 89% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the EFL Cup?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.