FC Groningen v Feyenoord
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before FC Groningen lost to Feyenoord 0–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Ayase Ueda for 1+ shots total (94%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Luciano Valente for 1+ shots total (87%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayase Ueda | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Leo Sauer | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Anis Hadj Moussa | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Quinten Timber | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Luciano Valente | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mark Hoekstra | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ayase Ueda | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
| Stije Resink | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Younes Taha | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mats Seuntjens | shots total | 1+ | 65% | 0 | ✗ |
| David van der Werff | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 2 | ✓ |
| Jordan Bos | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 1 | ✓ |
| Thom van Bergen | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 2 | ✓ |
| Tygo Land | shots total | 1+ | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Feyenoord 3–1 FC Groningen Apr 2026
- Feyenoord 4–1 FC Groningen Apr 2025
- FC Groningen 2–2 Feyenoord Sep 2024
- Feyenoord 1–0 FC Groningen Mar 2023
- FC Groningen 0–3 Feyenoord Jan 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on FC Groningen v Feyenoord?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on FC Groningen v Feyenoord?
The most confident call it got wrong was Luciano Valente at 87% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.