Feyenoord v Almere City FC
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Feyenoord beat Almere City FC 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Anis Hadj Moussa for 1+ shots total (94%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Ibrahim Osman for 1+ shots total (91%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anis Hadj Moussa | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Igor Paixão | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 6 | ✓ |
| Ibrahim Osman | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Julián Carranza | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Luka Ivanušec | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jakub Moder | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Antoni Milambo | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Charles-Andreas Brym | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Dávid Hancko | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Anis Hadj Moussa | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Kornelius Normann | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ruben Providence | shots total | 1+ | 65% | 2 | ✓ |
| Quilindschy Hartman | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 1 | ✓ |
| Gijs Smal | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Almere City FC 1–4 Feyenoord Nov 2024
- Almere City FC 0–2 Feyenoord Feb 2024
- Feyenoord 6–1 Almere City FC Aug 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Feyenoord v Almere City FC?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Feyenoord v Almere City FC?
The most confident call it got wrong was Ibrahim Osman at 91% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.