Heracles Almelo v Fortuna Sittard
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Heracles Almelo beat Fortuna Sittard 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Kaj Sierhuis for 1+ shots total (96%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Paul Gladon for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaj Sierhuis | shots total | 1+ | 96% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mohamed Ihattaren | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 4 | ✓ |
| Paul Gladon | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Naci Ünüvar | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Kristoffer Peterson | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lequincio Zeefuik | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kaj Sierhuis | shots on target | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Édouard Michut | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Mohamed Ihattaren | shots on target | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Paul Gladon | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ajdin Hrustić | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 3 | ✓ |
| Walid Ould-Chikh | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 0 | ✗ |
| Philip Brittijn | shots total | 1+ | 64% | 1 | ✓ |
| Justin Hubner | shots total | 1+ | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Fortuna Sittard 1–1 Heracles Almelo Nov 2025
- Fortuna Sittard 1–0 Heracles Almelo Mar 2025
- Heracles Almelo 2–2 Fortuna Sittard Dec 2024
- Heracles Almelo 0–0 Fortuna Sittard May 2024
- Fortuna Sittard 4–1 Heracles Almelo Nov 2023
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Heracles Almelo v Fortuna Sittard?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Heracles Almelo v Fortuna Sittard?
The most confident call it got wrong was Paul Gladon at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.