NEC Nijmegen v FC Utrecht
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before NEC Nijmegen lost to FC Utrecht 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 11 landed — the strongest being Danilo Pereira for 1+ shots total (94%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Jesper Karlsson for 1+ shots total (94%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danilo Pereira | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Jesper Karlsson | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 0 | ✗ |
| Youssef El Kachati | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Bryan Linssen | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Artem Stepanov | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yoann Cathline | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Ángel Alarcón | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 4 | ✓ |
| Tjaronn Chery | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 7 | ✓ |
| Başar Önal | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Gjivai Zechiël | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Noé Lebreton | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Danilo Pereira | shots on target | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sami Ouaissa | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dani De Wit | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FC Utrecht 1–0 NEC Nijmegen Nov 2025
- FC Utrecht 0–1 NEC Nijmegen Mar 2025
- NEC Nijmegen 1–2 FC Utrecht Nov 2024
- FC Utrecht 1–0 NEC Nijmegen Mar 2024
- NEC Nijmegen 3–0 FC Utrecht Sep 2023
- NEC Nijmegen 2–2 FC Utrecht Mar 2023
- FC Utrecht 0–0 NEC Nijmegen Sep 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on NEC Nijmegen v FC Utrecht?
11 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on NEC Nijmegen v FC Utrecht?
The most confident call it got wrong was Jesper Karlsson at 94% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.