NEC Nijmegen v RKC Waalwijk
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before NEC Nijmegen beat RKC Waalwijk 2–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 12 landed — the strongest being Kento Shiogai for 1+ shots total (94%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Lars Olden Larsen for 1+ shots total (91%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kento Shiogai | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 3 | ✓ |
| Mohamed Ihattaren | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 1 | ✓ |
| Lars Olden Larsen | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bryan Linssen | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 4 | ✓ |
| Başar Önal | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Michiel Kramer | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 3 | ✓ |
| Chris Lokesa | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sami Ouaissa | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sontje Hansen | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Richonell Margaret | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Thomas Ouwejan | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yassin Oukili | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 2 | ✓ |
| Kodai Sano | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 3 | ✓ |
| Kento Shiogai | shots on target | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- RKC Waalwijk 0–3 NEC Nijmegen Nov 2024
- RKC Waalwijk 2–0 NEC Nijmegen Feb 2024
- NEC Nijmegen 3–0 RKC Waalwijk Aug 2023
- RKC Waalwijk 1–3 NEC Nijmegen Mar 2023
- NEC Nijmegen 6–1 RKC Waalwijk Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on NEC Nijmegen v RKC Waalwijk?
12 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on NEC Nijmegen v RKC Waalwijk?
The most confident call it got wrong was Lars Olden Larsen at 91% for shots total — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.