RKC Waalwijk v FC Twente
How the SharpXI model rated this Eredivisie fixture — every call it made on shots, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before RKC Waalwijk drew with FC Twente 2–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Sam Lammers for 1+ shots total (94%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Sam Lammers for 1+ shots on target (82%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Lammers | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sem Steijn | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 5 | ✓ |
| Ricky van Wolfswinkel | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| Michel Vlap | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 2 | ✓ |
| Mitchell Van Bergen | shots total | 1+ | 91% | 3 | ✓ |
| Sam Lammers | shots on target | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Sem Steijn | shots on target | 1+ | 82% | 3 | ✓ |
| Chris Lokesa | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Sayfallah Ltaief | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Silvester van der Water | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Ricky van Wolfswinkel | shots on target | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Richonell Margaret | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Denilho Cleonise | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
| Bas Kuipers | shots total | 1+ | 72% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- FC Twente 2–0 RKC Waalwijk Feb 2025
- FC Twente 3–0 RKC Waalwijk Feb 2024
- RKC Waalwijk 1–0 FC Twente Sep 2023
- RKC Waalwijk 0–5 FC Twente May 2023
- FC Twente 3–0 RKC Waalwijk Oct 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on RKC Waalwijk v FC Twente?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on RKC Waalwijk v FC Twente?
The most confident call it got wrong was Sam Lammers at 82% for shots on target — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Eredivisie?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.