Tottenham v Bodø/Glimt
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Europa League fixture — every call it made on cards, shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Tottenham beat Bodø/Glimt 3–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 8 landed — the strongest being Dominic Solanke for 1+ shots total (97%, had 4). Its clearest miss: James Maddison for 1+ fouls drawn (92%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
10 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mathys Tel | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 2 | ✓ |
| Richarlison | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 2 | ✓ |
| Dominic Solanke | shots total | 1+ | 97% | 4 | ✓ |
| Destiny Udogie | tackles | 1+ | 97% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yves Bissouma | tackles | 1+ | 97% | 3 | ✓ |
| Dejan Kulusevski | shots total | 1+ | 94% | 2 | ✓ |
| James Maddison | fouls drawn | 1+ | 92% | 0 | ✗ |
| Pedro Porro | tackles | 1+ | 91% | 0 | ✗ |
| Brennan Johnson | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Jens Petter Hauge | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| James Maddison | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Rodrigo Bentancur | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 5 | ✓ |
| Dejan Kulusevski | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
| Cristian Romero | tackles | 1+ | 85% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Bodø/Glimt 2–2 Tottenham Sep 2025
- Bodø/Glimt 0–2 Tottenham May 2025
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Tottenham v Bodø/Glimt?
8 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Tottenham v Bodø/Glimt?
The most confident call it got wrong was James Maddison at 92% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Europa League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.