Romania v Bosnia & Herzegovina
How the SharpXI model rated this UEFA Nations League fixture — every call it made on shots, fouls and tackles, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Romania lost to Bosnia & Herzegovina 2–4, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 9 landed — the strongest being Ermedin Demirović for 1+ shots total (90%, had 1). Its clearest miss: Nicolae Stanciu for 1+ tackles (82%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
3 matches on record — too few to quote a card rate against. See the record
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Bîrligea | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 6 | ✓ |
| Ermedin Demirović | shots total | 1+ | 90% | 1 | ✓ |
| Haris Tabaković | shots total | 1+ | 87% | 2 | ✓ |
| Valentin Mihăilă | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 1 | ✓ |
| Nikola Katić | tackles | 1+ | 84% | 3 | ✓ |
| Nicolae Stanciu | tackles | 1+ | 82% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ermedin Demirović | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Daniel Bîrligea | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Haris Tabaković | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 0 | ✗ |
| Ermedin Demirović | fouls committed | 1+ | 79% | 0 | ✗ |
| Nicolae Stanciu | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Valentin Mihăilă | tackles | 1+ | 78% | 0 | ✗ |
| Valentin Mihăilă | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
| Nicolae Stanciu | fouls drawn | 1+ | 73% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Tackles Fouls drawn Fouls committed
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Romania 4–1 Bosnia & Herzegovina Sep 2022
- Bosnia & Herzegovina 1–0 Romania Jun 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Romania v Bosnia & Herzegovina?
9 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Romania v Bosnia & Herzegovina?
The most confident call it got wrong was Nicolae Stanciu at 82% for tackles — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the UEFA Nations League?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.