Cremonese v AC Milan
How the SharpXI model rated this Serie A fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Cremonese lost to AC Milan 0–2, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Rafael Leão for 1+ shots total (95%, had 6). Its clearest miss: Niclas Füllkrug for 1+ shots on target (92%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niclas Füllkrug | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 1 | ✓ |
| Rafael Leão | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 6 | ✓ |
| Federico Bonazzoli | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 4 | ✓ |
| Christian Pulišić | shots total | 1+ | 95% | 3 | ✓ |
| Rafael Leão | shots on target | 1+ | 92% | 3 | ✓ |
| Niclas Füllkrug | shots on target | 1+ | 92% | 0 | ✗ |
| Christian Pulišić | shots on target | 1+ | 92% | 1 | ✓ |
| Youssef Maleh | tackles | 1+ | 90% | 0 | ✗ |
| Adrien Rabiot | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 2 | ✓ |
| Youssouf Fofana | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 2 | ✓ |
| Milan Đurić | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alexis Saelemaekers | shots total | 1+ | 88% | 1 | ✓ |
| Alessio Zerbin | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 0 | ✗ |
| Fikayo Tomori | tackles | 1+ | 86% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Shots total Shots on target Tackles
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match goals | O2.5 | 55% | 2 goals | ✗ |
| BTTS | Yes | 54% | No | ✗ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 36% | 2 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Match goals Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- AC Milan 1–2 Cremonese Aug 2025
- AC Milan 1–1 Cremonese May 2023
- Cremonese 0–0 AC Milan Nov 2022
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Cremonese v AC Milan?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Cremonese v AC Milan?
The most confident call it got wrong was Niclas Füllkrug at 92% for shots on target — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Serie A?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.