1. FC Heidenheim v Holstein Kiel
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before 1. FC Heidenheim beat Holstein Kiel 3–1, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 13 landed — the strongest being Marvin Pieringer for 1+ fouls committed (80%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Fiete Arp for 1+ fouls drawn (76%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marvin Pieringer | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Fiete Arp | shots total | 1+ | 80% | 3 | ✓ |
| Marvin Pieringer | fouls drawn | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Steven Skrzybski | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 1 | ✓ |
| Marvin Pieringer | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 4 | ✓ |
| Budu Zivzivadze | shots total | 1+ | 78% | 1 | ✓ |
| Shuto Machino | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Benedikt Gimber | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 4 | ✓ |
| Adrian Beck | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 3 | ✓ |
| Phil Harres | fouls committed | 1+ | 77% | 1 | ✓ |
| Fiete Arp | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 0 | ✗ |
| Alexander Bernhardsson | shots total | 1+ | 76% | 1 | ✓ |
| Finn Porath | fouls drawn | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
| Fiete Arp | fouls committed | 1+ | 75% | 2 | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Fouls committed · Shots total · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTTS | Yes | 55% | Yes | ✓ |
| Match goals | O2.5 | 51% | 4 goals | ✓ |
| Match cards | O4.5 | 50% | 4 cards | ✗ |
How these are modelled: BTTS · Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- Holstein Kiel 1–0 1. FC Heidenheim Nov 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on 1. FC Heidenheim v Holstein Kiel?
13 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on 1. FC Heidenheim v Holstein Kiel?
The most confident call it got wrong was Fiete Arp at 76% for fouls drawn — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.