Darmstadt 98 v RB Leipzig
How the SharpXI model rated this Bundesliga fixture — every call it made on shots, cards and fouls, set against what actually happened on the day.
Before Darmstadt 98 lost to RB Leipzig 1–3, the SharpXI model made 14 confident calls on the player markets and 10 landed — the strongest being Loïs Openda for 1+ shots total (85%, had 3). Its clearest miss: Christoph Baumgartner for 1+ fouls committed (80%, had 0). Every probability here was published before kick-off, priced the same way as every other fixture — one game is noise, not a verdict.
Player markets — the model's calls
Each probability is the model's own number for the headline (1+) line, before any bookmaker margin. The result column is what the player actually recorded.
| Player | Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loïs Openda | shots total | 1+ | 85% | 3 | ✓ |
| Luca Pfeiffer | fouls committed | 1+ | 84% | 1 | ✓ |
| Yussuf Poulsen | fouls drawn | 1+ | 82% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christoph Baumgartner | fouls committed | 1+ | 80% | 0 | ✗ |
| Yussuf Poulsen | shots total | 1+ | 79% | 2 | ✓ |
| Loïs Openda | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christoph Baumgartner | fouls drawn | 1+ | 78% | 2 | ✓ |
| Christoph Baumgartner | shots total | 1+ | 77% | 0 | ✗ |
| Emil Forsberg | fouls drawn | 1+ | 76% | 2 | ✓ |
| Xavi Simons | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 0 | ✗ |
| Oscar Vilhelmsson | fouls committed | 1+ | 74% | 1 | ✓ |
| Emil Forsberg | shots total | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
| Xavi Simons | fouls drawn | 1+ | 74% | 2 | ✓ |
| Fraser Hornby | shots total | 1+ | 73% | 0 | ✗ |
How these are modelled: Shots total · Fouls committed · Fouls drawn
Team & match markets
| Market | Line | Model | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Match cards | O4.5 | 71% | 9 cards | ✓ |
How these are modelled: Match cards
Dig deeper
Past meetings
- RB Leipzig 2–0 Darmstadt 98 Mar 2024
Frequently asked
How did the SharpXI model do on Darmstadt 98 v RB Leipzig?
10 of its 14 most-confident calls landed. The board on this page lists every one with the model's pre-kickoff probability next to what actually happened, hits and misses in the same table.
What did the model get wrong on Darmstadt 98 v RB Leipzig?
The most confident call it got wrong was Christoph Baumgartner at 80% for fouls committed — shown in the same table as the hits, marked with a cross. A record that hides its misses isn't a record, so we don't.
Are these probabilities hindsight?
No. Each one is the number the model produced from data available before kick-off, using the same settings as every other fixture on the site — nothing was refitted after the result. That is the only way a per-match report means anything.
Does one match tell you if the model is any good in the Bundesliga?
No, and we'd rather say so. A single fixture is a handful of calls and mostly noise; the season-long, market-by-market record — including the markets that fail to beat a naive guess — is on the track record page.
SharpXI models probabilities from public match data; it does not take bets or guarantee outcomes. Prices are entered per leg in the tool. 18+ — please gamble responsibly.